A
"reversible" mod to extend the range of the ME-61. |
|
|
|
5-7 turn coil The simple mod. A 30 minute project. Which will increase the sensitivity of the ME-61 on 29.0 and 51.0. Mc. More info below. |
|
The ME-61 has a design frequency range that covers up to 24 Mcs. Band 3 is designed to cover 10 to 24 Mcs. The "reversible" modification will change the coverage of Band 3 to a higher frequency range. |
|
Ans: Yes when measuring higher power levels if you set the ME-61 tuning control to 24 you will get a reading. Q. The reading that I obtain - is it usable? Ans. Depends. Most field strength readings for the purpose of antenna tuning particularly in the VHF range require as much separation as possible between the transmitter antenna and the field strength meter to be reliable. At low power levels the ME-61 is not sensitive enough and can not provide this. Q. Can the ME-61 (unmodified) be used for antenna tuning on low power radios such as the PRC-6? Ans: With VHF power levels less than 1 watt the ME-61 is fairly useless when tuning the antenna system as you have very little separation between the transmitter antenna and the ME-61 antenna. Best results occur when separation distance between the transmitter and the field strength meter is as far as possible. Q.
I've found that the ME-61 is not very sensitive even on its designed
operational range. Is there anything I can do? http://k4che.com/ME-61/ME-61.htm
|
|
These "low power" radios on 51.0 Mc utilize field strength when aligning the antenna section. At low transmit powers the stock ME-61 will not allow accurate field strength measurements as you can not get far enough away from the transmitter antenna and the operators body gets in the way as well as near by objects. |
|
Note: The unofficial military equipment collectors FM calling frequencies are 29.4 and 51.0.
|
|
|
|
Bench tests tuning of L3 During Bench Testing L3 was adjusted to minimum inductance. The meter frequency coverage was extended to 45 Mc but would not cover 51.0 However the meter would cover 10 meter (29.6) So-sorrie G.I. No workee on 6. Further modification of L3 would be necessary for proper 51.0 coverage. |
|
|
|
NOTE: Spot solder the modification coil in place - then you can use meter on the higher frequency and when you are done just unsolder one end of the coil to return the meter to its original configuration. Or get creative and install a small switch. | |
The
inductance of L3 is 1.2 to 1.9 uH or about 1.5 uH average. So adding a
smaller value in parallel will reduce the overall inductance and raise
the frequency coverage. TIP: When working with coils in parallel the total inductance of the the parallel combination will always be LESS than the smallest inductance that is wired in parallel. |
|
|
|
The "measured" inductance was approximately .4 uH. Its hard to measure very small inductance value. |
|
Answer: .31 uH. Note that the final inductance is smaller thatn the smaller .4 coil.
|
|
http://www.deephaven.co.uk/lc.html The computed resonance for the above are 90 Mcs and 24 Mc so as estimated range for the ME-61 with the coil mod is 24 to 90 Mc which more than covers 6 and 10 meters. My meter the coverage was a lot less so a slight error must have been made in the measurement of the inductance.
|
|
7 Turn coil The modification coil of 6-7turns can be compressed or expanded to raise or lower frequency. Its not exactly "Rocket Science" try it. Coil shown above gave coverage from 24 Mc to 70 Mc. |
|
All though antenna tuning is not needed on the PRC-10 confirming a active antenna mount on the PRC-10 is very important. Most ham hacked PRC-10's have errors in the Long Ant and Short Ant front panel antenna wiring and the antennas are not connected properly to internal loading coils. |
|
RETURN to K4CHE Index |