|  
                                                        Military 
        Collector Group Post Backmail #57 (16pages) Index: RADIO MEMORIES; of Ltc. Bob Paterson USMC, USA(ret) 
        (RS-6, GRC-9, PRC-25 & Others) RAYTHEON STORY PART I; RAYTHEON'S NAME 
        ORIGINATES RAYTHEON STORY PART II; RAYTHEON COMES OF AGE DURING WW-II 
        WAR EMERGENCY RADIO SERVICE; By Jeffrey Herman NAVAL HISTORY, Old Iron 
        Sides; From Sheldon Wheaton B-17 RADIO OPERATOR; A GLIMPSE OF NAVAL RADIO 
        OPERATIONS IN KOREA; By Jerry Proc VE3FAB *********************************************** 
        RADIO MEMORIES; of Ltc. Bob Paterson USMC, USA(ret) (RS-6, GRC-9, PRC-25 
        & Others) I have enjoyed your e-mails concerning military radio gear. 
        I am a retired LTC from the Army and before that was a radio operator 
        for several years in the Marines in the late 50's and early 60's. I was 
        a CW op in a Force Recon unit and I remember we used some very small gear 
        that we borrowed from the Special Forces in about '63 or '64 that was 
        suposedly very classified at the time. It was two units (rcvr / xmtr) 
        about 5" to 6" square and had a small CW key that swiveled out of the 
        side of the xmtr. The rig ran about 10-15 watts and worked pretty well! 
        Largest part of the system was the hand crank generator! (I recall that 
        I thought the whole thing would be a nice little rig for Ham Radio Hi!) 
        You might know something about this gear... Boy that was a long time ago!! 
        I just can not remember much about the little CW rig that I mentioned, 
        as I only got to use it for a few days. The SF had only 2 or 3 of these 
        little rigs and we got one to try out. I got to work it and made a contact 
        from a NC field site to another Marine Recon team we had training along 
        a Florida coast line. As I remember I set the freq from a chart that was 
        attached...dialed in one or two controls according to the chart and then 
        it was ready. We used a short pre made dipole and it worked pretty good. 
        I also used the old ANGRC 9 on CW a lot. Clunky but good an reliable. 
        First FM gear I used was an AN/VRQ series rig. At that time the Artillery 
        used one (AN/VRQ-2) on on set of freqs...the Infantry used another (VRQ3?)on 
        the freqs a little higher (I think it was)...and armor used the (AN/VRQ4) 
        which was higher still in freq. Artillery and Armor over lapped into the 
        Infantry freqs..This allowed the infantry to talk to everyone, but armor 
        and artillery could not interfere with each other. Or so was the plan. 
        It caused a lot of foul ups by not being able to talk across the board. 
        Another special rig I ran across was an English RACAL (Special Air Service)SAS 
        rig used by commando and special ops units. I was a commo officer in Europe 
        in a security unit that provided security for US Pershing Nuc Missiles. 
        Once we had a two week field problem working against Belgian and US Special 
        Forces type units. We had all the new 'toys' to use against them and NADIC 
        LABS gave us lots to play with. (New night vision gear, ground radar, 
        seismic devices that looked like a string of tent pegs connected to a 
        2 meter HT!) Anyway, we "captured" most of a Belgian SF unit that mistakenly 
        parachuted right into our base camp (shades of the Longest Day!!) and 
        I got all their commo gear to look over. Of special interest to me was 
        a small RACAL rig for CW that had a special unit with a "wind up" device 
        to plug into the transmitter. To use it, you recorded your message off-the-air 
        using a one-time code/cipher and this device recorded it at a regular 
        speed. Then you wound this thing up like a clock and plugged it into the 
        xmtr. At the exact pre-programmed time, you came up on freq..gave one 
        short call and turned this device known as a "Burster" on. It sent a CW 
        message that sounded like a high pitched "zip". You could send a minute 
        or two of CW in just seconds! It was recorded on the other end at the 
        fast speed, and when played back at a slow speed it could be copied and 
        then deciphered. Rather neat idea for special ops units who did not want 
        to be DF'd and caught sending long transmissions! We made lots of homebrew 
        directional antennas and regularly got 40+ Km range from rigs (PRC25's). 
        Used tin cans, dirt and motor oil to make a 600 ohm resistor to terminate 
        the antenna..Left these things all over Germany up in the trees! Ha! Also 
        made 3 el yagis from wood stock and welding rods and lots more. The range 
        was important, but just as important was the directivity that helped avoid 
        direction finders (DF) and getting caught on patrols. In Europe for 3 
        years and then later in the US (I was Army Aviation Advisor to ARK Army 
        Guard for a 3 years in 78-80) I taught Electronic Warfare training for 
        tactical units. Used to have some neat jamming tapes around that I used. 
        If I can find them , I'll send one along if you like. Let me have your 
        address. We had lots of good training (and a quite a few laughs)fouling 
        up the units training in Europe when they tried to talk like they were 
        on 2 meters!! They really learned quickly how to work thru and around 
        this stuff as I chased them all over the air. (Incidentally, I noted in 
        the paper today that the Serbs are doing a good job of monitoring NATO 
        aircraft and reacting to the message traffic just as I did!! Seems some 
        more training might be in order?) Well thought this might be of interest 
        to you, Dennis...Maybe I will catch you at the Fest here in Springfield 
        this year.. 73 Bob Patterson K5DZE ed) Of course, the radio Bob describes 
        in paragraph #1 is the RS-6. The VRQ series he relates in paragraph #3 
        are the RT-66, -67, -68 family of radio systems. Isn't it ironic how the 
        Navy always chooses to change designations just enough to confuse things! 
        It would be nice to know exactly what the British SAS Racal set was, but 
        we can be sure that the "burst keyer" in question was the GRA-71. The 
        North Vietnamese & Viet-cong forces were very highly adept at using radio 
        anti-electronic-warfare techniques. I/E directional antennas on HF and 
        even VHF radios at all times. They religiously used the lowest power setting 
        a radio had whenever possible, and kept transmission time to an absolute 
        minimum. As a result, the efforts of Military Intelligence search, surveillance, 
        and direction finding where completely in vain, and jamming was impossible 
        as they could detect nothing to jam. In contrast, the enemy's own Electronic 
        Warfare efforts against us were highly effective. Today, the armies of 
        the would try to counter the effects of Electronic Warfare with supper 
        high tech frequency hopping, encrypted radios with so may bells and whistles 
        that they can't be kept operational in the field. The can only be used 
        by the most skilled of highly trained operators, and reliability is non-existent. 
        After nearly 35 years a viable replacement for the aging, and primitive 
        PRC-77 has yet to materialize. Isn't it a shame that we can't learn from 
        history! *********************************************** RAYTHEON STORY; 
        Forward: I am a 25 year employee of E-Systems, which has recently been 
        bought by Raytheon. I have requested and received permission to reprint 
        two articles on your net from an in-house Raytheon publication. The articles 
        are titled "Raytheon's Name Originates with Radio Tube" and "Raytheon 
        Comes of Age During World War II". The first article is a short story 
        about 6 paragraphs long detailing the origination of Raytheon and their 
        tube production. The second article, about 5 paragraphs long, details 
        an interesting story about Raytheon's efforts to manufacture the magnetron 
        tubes for British radar for the war effort. George Humphrey, KC5WBV gah@koyote.com 
        The following is Reprinted with permission from a Raytheon Systems Company 
        publication "The Bulletin" RAYTHEON'S NAME ORIGINATES WITH RADIO TUBE 
        "Who is Mr. Raytheon?" This is one of many questions that employees have 
        asked about the history of Raytheon Company. Mr. Raytheon never existed, 
        but there was a Laurence Marshall. In 1922, Laurence K. Marshall formed 
        the American Appliance Company with his college roommates, Vanevar Bush, 
        and Charles G. Smith, a young scientist who had developed the prototype 
        for a home refrigerator that used artificial coolants. Marshall, an engineer, 
        businessman and trained physicist, and Bush, a scientist and professor 
        of electrical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 
        along with several other financial backers dreamed of prosperity and a 
        potential market for their newly developed refrigerator. As is the case 
        with so many other entrepreneurs, however, the product that launched the 
        company was a bust and never left the laboratory. Facing failure, they 
        decided to revisit an earlier idea Smith had experimented with: a new 
        kind of gaseous tube that would allow radios for the first time to be 
        plugged into a wall socket and operate on electricity rather than batteries. 
        The tube would overcome the need for two expensive, short-lived batteries, 
        the greatest shortcoming to widespread radio use at the time, by devising 
        a way to replace the B battery with a tube, the small company not only 
        triumphed over the army of researchers and engineers of RCA, Westinghouse 
        and other corporate giants. It produced a device that forced the entire 
        radio industry into a new direction and made radios affordable and accessible 
        to every household. Perfected and introduced to the public in 1925, the 
        tube named "Raytheon," which was derived from the Old French name for 
        a beam of light, "Rai" and "theon," a Greek term meaning "from the gods," 
        brought in more than $1 million in sales by the end of 1926. In 1925, 
        an Indiana company made it known that it held prior claim to the American 
        Appliance Company name. Because of the success of the Raytheon radio tube, 
        company officials at that time elected to extend the use of the name to 
        describe the entire organization, and the company's name was officially 
        changed to Raytheon Manufacturing Company. Both the product and company 
        name were deemed scientifically appropriate given groundbreaking research 
        at the time on the mystery of the Wolf-Rayet star Zeta Puppis, which emitted 
        bright ultraviolet lines believed to be the result of gaseous substances. 
        Laboratory experiments by C. G. Smith on the source of these gases became 
        the basis of crucial importance to his development of the company's radio 
        tube. The success of the Raytheon tube positioned the company as a major 
        contributor to the fast-growing radio tube market for nearly two decades. 
        *********************************************** RAYTHEON STORY PART II; 
        Raytheon Comes of Age During World War II By Jacqueline Sagl, Raytheon 
        Corporate Communications This is the second in a series of articles for 
        The Bulletin exploring the company's history:Reprinted with permission 
        from an internal Raytheon Systems Company publication titled " The Bulletin". 
        During World War II, British scientists had developed short-wave, or microwave, 
        radar in an effort to protect itself against enemy aircraft. Britain considered 
        the radar to be its most important advantage against Nazi raids because 
        it enabled them to "see" at night when the Nazis were virtually blind. 
        However, at the time, Britain was not able to devise a method of mass 
        producing magnetron tubes, the heart of its radar. In urgent need to mass 
        produce the tens of thousands of magnetron tubes that would be required 
        to thwart Luftwaffe raids and counterattack the Germans, Britain turned 
        to the United States for help. In 1940, British scientists traveled to 
        the United States to enlist help from America's largest industrial firms. 
        Raytheon, which already had been experimenting with microwave tubes and 
        producing transmitting tubes, was considered too small to be in the running 
        and was not on the list of companies the British planned to visit. At 
        the recommendation of Edward Bowles, director of MIT's Radiation Laboratory, 
        Raytheon was added to the list and a meeting was arranged between Britain's 
        leading scientists and Raytheon engineer, Percy L. Spencer. Spencer, a 
        man with only a grade school education, listened carefully to the British 
        describe their method of producing the magnetron tubes, a process Spencer 
        boldly informed them was "awkward and impractical." He persuaded the scientists 
        to allow him to take the tube, Britain's most valuable secret weapon, 
        home for the weekend. On Monday, Percy Spencer arrived at work with it 
        all figured out. Not only had he come up with radical changes that would 
        simplify the manufacturing process, his recommendations would also improve 
        the functioning of the radar overall. Impressed, Britain awarded, through 
        the MIT Radiation Laboratory, "little" Raytheon a small contract to supply 
        the magnetrons at the same time it awarded giant Western Electric a large 
        contract. By 1944, Raytheon was producing 2,000 magnetron tubes per day. 
        Raytheon eventually was established as the major magnetron supplier during 
        the war, providing the most important military advantage for Britain and 
        the Allied Forces. At the end of the war, Raytheon was producing 80 percent 
        of all magnetrons, leaving Western Electric, RCA, GE and other giants 
        far behind. Submitted by George Humphrey 73 KC5WBV gah@koyote.com *********************************************** 
        WAR EMERGENCY RADIO SERVICE; By Jeffrey Herman First a bit of background: 
        In 1939 there were 51,000 US hams. In Sept. of that year war came to Europe. 
        Of the 250 DXCC countries, 121 of them immediately went off the air (including 
        Canada and the UK). The US maintained the strictest sense of neutrality. 
        This was re-enforced by the ARRL, which came up with a neutrality code 
        for amateurs. Hams were asked by the ARRL to voluntarily abide by the 
        code, which they did en masse; this earned additional support for the 
        amateur radio service in governmental circles. (In an effort to streamline 
        its operation in preparation for possible US involvement in the war, the 
        FCC at this time introduced multiple- choice tests.) By June 1940, the 
        US invoked the Telecommunications Convention prohibiting US amateurs from 
        contacting hams elsewhere; at the same time all portable and mobile operation 
        below 56 MHz was banned (except the ARRL Field Day). At the request of 
        the ARRL, the ban was modified to allow the League's Emergency Corps to 
        continue work on the lower frequencies for training and drills. All licensees 
        were required to send a set of fingerprints, a photo, and proof of citizenship 
        to the FCC. The FCC needed 500 radio operators to man listening and direction- 
        finding stations - they asked the League's assistance - the League put 
        out the word in QST and within days of that issue, the FCC had the 500 
        operators it needed. (It's important to note for the duration of the war, 
        the military and government always turned to the ARRL when radio operators 
        and equipment were needed; the League would put out the call in QST and 
        over W1AW, and the quotas were always filled in short order. Of the 51 
        kilohams mentioned above, 25k enlisted, and 25k remained at home to teach 
        radio and electronics, serve in the communications industry, and serve 
        in WERS.) By June of 1941, tubes and other components were in short supply; 
        each time the military asked hams to donate parts, they were flooded with 
        whatever was needed. Many US hams were recruited for a Civilian Technical 
        Corps to operate and repair British radar equipment. Also at this time, 
        the Office of Civil Defense, at the offering of the ARRL, created a CD 
        comm system with ham radio as its backbone (this relationship between 
        between CD and ARS exists even today). Because the Army needed 80m, the 
        FCC gave hams 40m phone privileges for the first time, to make up for 
        the loss of 80. December 7, 1941, the US entered the war; hams were immediately 
        ordered to go QRT. By special FCC order, the ARRL's W1AW was to continue 
        its transmissions. At the request of the ARRL, the War Emergency Radio 
        Service (WERS) was created in June 1942. The GPO was inundated so the 
        rules for WERS appeared only in QST. At the League's insistence, the FCC 
        continued to offer amateur licensing throughout the war; this to provide 
        standards for WERS applicants, and more importantly, to enable amateurs 
        to prove their ability before enlisting in the armed services. The purpose 
        of WERS was to provide communications in connection with air raid protection, 
        and to allow operators to continue their role in providing comms during 
        times of natural disaster as they'd been doing as hams (WERS was not part 
        of the amateur service, but was manned by hams; non-amateurs were permitted 
        to serve in WERS in low level positions). WERS was administered by local 
        CD offices; WERS licenses were issued to communities, not individuals. 
        WERS operated on the former amateur 2 1/2 meter band (112-116 MHz) and 
        on higher frequencies. Again, WERS was not part of the amateur service 
        but hams were asked by OCD to join - and they flocked to it. Until the 
        end of the war, if a ham wanted to operate he could only do so as a WERS 
        operator. QST fully supported WERS by publishing technical articles on 
        building WERS gear and modifying existing 2 1/2 m ham equipment so as 
        to meet the rigid WERS standards. Nearly every issued of QST contained 
        WERS articles - two examples: Oct. 1942: WERS operating procedures; how 
        to train auxiliary (non-amateur) operators. Feb. 1943: OCD's plan for 
        selecting frequencies. A sample of WERS operations: May and July 1942 
        - comms support for flooding of the Mississippi and Lake Erie; 1944 comms 
        support after an Atlantic Coast hurricane; 1945 - Western NY snowstorm 
        early in the year, spring flooding, and a September Florida hurricane. 
        After VJ Day in 1945, hams were given authorization to begin operating 
        again on the 2 1/2 m band, on a shared basis with WERS. WERS was terminated 
        in mid-November. By the 15th of that month, the FCC released bands at 
        10, 5, and 2m for amateur use. The post-war era of amateur radio had commenced. 
        This is probably more than you wanted to know! I really love radio history 
        and enjoy sharing it with anyone who expresses an interest. 73, Jeff KH2PZ   | 
    ||
|                                            Continue 
      with Backmail 58 Return Backmail Index  | 
    ||