Military
Collector Group Post Backmail #57 (16pages) Index: RADIO MEMORIES; of Ltc. Bob Paterson USMC, USA(ret)
(RS-6, GRC-9, PRC-25 & Others) RAYTHEON STORY PART I; RAYTHEON'S NAME
ORIGINATES RAYTHEON STORY PART II; RAYTHEON COMES OF AGE DURING WW-II
WAR EMERGENCY RADIO SERVICE; By Jeffrey Herman NAVAL HISTORY, Old Iron
Sides; From Sheldon Wheaton B-17 RADIO OPERATOR; A GLIMPSE OF NAVAL RADIO
OPERATIONS IN KOREA; By Jerry Proc VE3FAB ***********************************************
RADIO MEMORIES; of Ltc. Bob Paterson USMC, USA(ret) (RS-6, GRC-9, PRC-25
& Others) I have enjoyed your e-mails concerning military radio gear.
I am a retired LTC from the Army and before that was a radio operator
for several years in the Marines in the late 50's and early 60's. I was
a CW op in a Force Recon unit and I remember we used some very small gear
that we borrowed from the Special Forces in about '63 or '64 that was
suposedly very classified at the time. It was two units (rcvr / xmtr)
about 5" to 6" square and had a small CW key that swiveled out of the
side of the xmtr. The rig ran about 10-15 watts and worked pretty well!
Largest part of the system was the hand crank generator! (I recall that
I thought the whole thing would be a nice little rig for Ham Radio Hi!)
You might know something about this gear... Boy that was a long time ago!!
I just can not remember much about the little CW rig that I mentioned,
as I only got to use it for a few days. The SF had only 2 or 3 of these
little rigs and we got one to try out. I got to work it and made a contact
from a NC field site to another Marine Recon team we had training along
a Florida coast line. As I remember I set the freq from a chart that was
attached...dialed in one or two controls according to the chart and then
it was ready. We used a short pre made dipole and it worked pretty good.
I also used the old ANGRC 9 on CW a lot. Clunky but good an reliable.
First FM gear I used was an AN/VRQ series rig. At that time the Artillery
used one (AN/VRQ-2) on on set of freqs...the Infantry used another (VRQ3?)on
the freqs a little higher (I think it was)...and armor used the (AN/VRQ4)
which was higher still in freq. Artillery and Armor over lapped into the
Infantry freqs..This allowed the infantry to talk to everyone, but armor
and artillery could not interfere with each other. Or so was the plan.
It caused a lot of foul ups by not being able to talk across the board.
Another special rig I ran across was an English RACAL (Special Air Service)SAS
rig used by commando and special ops units. I was a commo officer in Europe
in a security unit that provided security for US Pershing Nuc Missiles.
Once we had a two week field problem working against Belgian and US Special
Forces type units. We had all the new 'toys' to use against them and NADIC
LABS gave us lots to play with. (New night vision gear, ground radar,
seismic devices that looked like a string of tent pegs connected to a
2 meter HT!) Anyway, we "captured" most of a Belgian SF unit that mistakenly
parachuted right into our base camp (shades of the Longest Day!!) and
I got all their commo gear to look over. Of special interest to me was
a small RACAL rig for CW that had a special unit with a "wind up" device
to plug into the transmitter. To use it, you recorded your message off-the-air
using a one-time code/cipher and this device recorded it at a regular
speed. Then you wound this thing up like a clock and plugged it into the
xmtr. At the exact pre-programmed time, you came up on freq..gave one
short call and turned this device known as a "Burster" on. It sent a CW
message that sounded like a high pitched "zip". You could send a minute
or two of CW in just seconds! It was recorded on the other end at the
fast speed, and when played back at a slow speed it could be copied and
then deciphered. Rather neat idea for special ops units who did not want
to be DF'd and caught sending long transmissions! We made lots of homebrew
directional antennas and regularly got 40+ Km range from rigs (PRC25's).
Used tin cans, dirt and motor oil to make a 600 ohm resistor to terminate
the antenna..Left these things all over Germany up in the trees! Ha! Also
made 3 el yagis from wood stock and welding rods and lots more. The range
was important, but just as important was the directivity that helped avoid
direction finders (DF) and getting caught on patrols. In Europe for 3
years and then later in the US (I was Army Aviation Advisor to ARK Army
Guard for a 3 years in 78-80) I taught Electronic Warfare training for
tactical units. Used to have some neat jamming tapes around that I used.
If I can find them , I'll send one along if you like. Let me have your
address. We had lots of good training (and a quite a few laughs)fouling
up the units training in Europe when they tried to talk like they were
on 2 meters!! They really learned quickly how to work thru and around
this stuff as I chased them all over the air. (Incidentally, I noted in
the paper today that the Serbs are doing a good job of monitoring NATO
aircraft and reacting to the message traffic just as I did!! Seems some
more training might be in order?) Well thought this might be of interest
to you, Dennis...Maybe I will catch you at the Fest here in Springfield
this year.. 73 Bob Patterson K5DZE ed) Of course, the radio Bob describes
in paragraph #1 is the RS-6. The VRQ series he relates in paragraph #3
are the RT-66, -67, -68 family of radio systems. Isn't it ironic how the
Navy always chooses to change designations just enough to confuse things!
It would be nice to know exactly what the British SAS Racal set was, but
we can be sure that the "burst keyer" in question was the GRA-71. The
North Vietnamese & Viet-cong forces were very highly adept at using radio
anti-electronic-warfare techniques. I/E directional antennas on HF and
even VHF radios at all times. They religiously used the lowest power setting
a radio had whenever possible, and kept transmission time to an absolute
minimum. As a result, the efforts of Military Intelligence search, surveillance,
and direction finding where completely in vain, and jamming was impossible
as they could detect nothing to jam. In contrast, the enemy's own Electronic
Warfare efforts against us were highly effective. Today, the armies of
the would try to counter the effects of Electronic Warfare with supper
high tech frequency hopping, encrypted radios with so may bells and whistles
that they can't be kept operational in the field. The can only be used
by the most skilled of highly trained operators, and reliability is non-existent.
After nearly 35 years a viable replacement for the aging, and primitive
PRC-77 has yet to materialize. Isn't it a shame that we can't learn from
history! *********************************************** RAYTHEON STORY;
Forward: I am a 25 year employee of E-Systems, which has recently been
bought by Raytheon. I have requested and received permission to reprint
two articles on your net from an in-house Raytheon publication. The articles
are titled "Raytheon's Name Originates with Radio Tube" and "Raytheon
Comes of Age During World War II". The first article is a short story
about 6 paragraphs long detailing the origination of Raytheon and their
tube production. The second article, about 5 paragraphs long, details
an interesting story about Raytheon's efforts to manufacture the magnetron
tubes for British radar for the war effort. George Humphrey, KC5WBV gah@koyote.com
The following is Reprinted with permission from a Raytheon Systems Company
publication "The Bulletin" RAYTHEON'S NAME ORIGINATES WITH RADIO TUBE
"Who is Mr. Raytheon?" This is one of many questions that employees have
asked about the history of Raytheon Company. Mr. Raytheon never existed,
but there was a Laurence Marshall. In 1922, Laurence K. Marshall formed
the American Appliance Company with his college roommates, Vanevar Bush,
and Charles G. Smith, a young scientist who had developed the prototype
for a home refrigerator that used artificial coolants. Marshall, an engineer,
businessman and trained physicist, and Bush, a scientist and professor
of electrical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
along with several other financial backers dreamed of prosperity and a
potential market for their newly developed refrigerator. As is the case
with so many other entrepreneurs, however, the product that launched the
company was a bust and never left the laboratory. Facing failure, they
decided to revisit an earlier idea Smith had experimented with: a new
kind of gaseous tube that would allow radios for the first time to be
plugged into a wall socket and operate on electricity rather than batteries.
The tube would overcome the need for two expensive, short-lived batteries,
the greatest shortcoming to widespread radio use at the time, by devising
a way to replace the B battery with a tube, the small company not only
triumphed over the army of researchers and engineers of RCA, Westinghouse
and other corporate giants. It produced a device that forced the entire
radio industry into a new direction and made radios affordable and accessible
to every household. Perfected and introduced to the public in 1925, the
tube named "Raytheon," which was derived from the Old French name for
a beam of light, "Rai" and "theon," a Greek term meaning "from the gods,"
brought in more than $1 million in sales by the end of 1926. In 1925,
an Indiana company made it known that it held prior claim to the American
Appliance Company name. Because of the success of the Raytheon radio tube,
company officials at that time elected to extend the use of the name to
describe the entire organization, and the company's name was officially
changed to Raytheon Manufacturing Company. Both the product and company
name were deemed scientifically appropriate given groundbreaking research
at the time on the mystery of the Wolf-Rayet star Zeta Puppis, which emitted
bright ultraviolet lines believed to be the result of gaseous substances.
Laboratory experiments by C. G. Smith on the source of these gases became
the basis of crucial importance to his development of the company's radio
tube. The success of the Raytheon tube positioned the company as a major
contributor to the fast-growing radio tube market for nearly two decades.
*********************************************** RAYTHEON STORY PART II;
Raytheon Comes of Age During World War II By Jacqueline Sagl, Raytheon
Corporate Communications This is the second in a series of articles for
The Bulletin exploring the company's history:Reprinted with permission
from an internal Raytheon Systems Company publication titled " The Bulletin".
During World War II, British scientists had developed short-wave, or microwave,
radar in an effort to protect itself against enemy aircraft. Britain considered
the radar to be its most important advantage against Nazi raids because
it enabled them to "see" at night when the Nazis were virtually blind.
However, at the time, Britain was not able to devise a method of mass
producing magnetron tubes, the heart of its radar. In urgent need to mass
produce the tens of thousands of magnetron tubes that would be required
to thwart Luftwaffe raids and counterattack the Germans, Britain turned
to the United States for help. In 1940, British scientists traveled to
the United States to enlist help from America's largest industrial firms.
Raytheon, which already had been experimenting with microwave tubes and
producing transmitting tubes, was considered too small to be in the running
and was not on the list of companies the British planned to visit. At
the recommendation of Edward Bowles, director of MIT's Radiation Laboratory,
Raytheon was added to the list and a meeting was arranged between Britain's
leading scientists and Raytheon engineer, Percy L. Spencer. Spencer, a
man with only a grade school education, listened carefully to the British
describe their method of producing the magnetron tubes, a process Spencer
boldly informed them was "awkward and impractical." He persuaded the scientists
to allow him to take the tube, Britain's most valuable secret weapon,
home for the weekend. On Monday, Percy Spencer arrived at work with it
all figured out. Not only had he come up with radical changes that would
simplify the manufacturing process, his recommendations would also improve
the functioning of the radar overall. Impressed, Britain awarded, through
the MIT Radiation Laboratory, "little" Raytheon a small contract to supply
the magnetrons at the same time it awarded giant Western Electric a large
contract. By 1944, Raytheon was producing 2,000 magnetron tubes per day.
Raytheon eventually was established as the major magnetron supplier during
the war, providing the most important military advantage for Britain and
the Allied Forces. At the end of the war, Raytheon was producing 80 percent
of all magnetrons, leaving Western Electric, RCA, GE and other giants
far behind. Submitted by George Humphrey 73 KC5WBV gah@koyote.com ***********************************************
WAR EMERGENCY RADIO SERVICE; By Jeffrey Herman First a bit of background:
In 1939 there were 51,000 US hams. In Sept. of that year war came to Europe.
Of the 250 DXCC countries, 121 of them immediately went off the air (including
Canada and the UK). The US maintained the strictest sense of neutrality.
This was re-enforced by the ARRL, which came up with a neutrality code
for amateurs. Hams were asked by the ARRL to voluntarily abide by the
code, which they did en masse; this earned additional support for the
amateur radio service in governmental circles. (In an effort to streamline
its operation in preparation for possible US involvement in the war, the
FCC at this time introduced multiple- choice tests.) By June 1940, the
US invoked the Telecommunications Convention prohibiting US amateurs from
contacting hams elsewhere; at the same time all portable and mobile operation
below 56 MHz was banned (except the ARRL Field Day). At the request of
the ARRL, the ban was modified to allow the League's Emergency Corps to
continue work on the lower frequencies for training and drills. All licensees
were required to send a set of fingerprints, a photo, and proof of citizenship
to the FCC. The FCC needed 500 radio operators to man listening and direction-
finding stations - they asked the League's assistance - the League put
out the word in QST and within days of that issue, the FCC had the 500
operators it needed. (It's important to note for the duration of the war,
the military and government always turned to the ARRL when radio operators
and equipment were needed; the League would put out the call in QST and
over W1AW, and the quotas were always filled in short order. Of the 51
kilohams mentioned above, 25k enlisted, and 25k remained at home to teach
radio and electronics, serve in the communications industry, and serve
in WERS.) By June of 1941, tubes and other components were in short supply;
each time the military asked hams to donate parts, they were flooded with
whatever was needed. Many US hams were recruited for a Civilian Technical
Corps to operate and repair British radar equipment. Also at this time,
the Office of Civil Defense, at the offering of the ARRL, created a CD
comm system with ham radio as its backbone (this relationship between
between CD and ARS exists even today). Because the Army needed 80m, the
FCC gave hams 40m phone privileges for the first time, to make up for
the loss of 80. December 7, 1941, the US entered the war; hams were immediately
ordered to go QRT. By special FCC order, the ARRL's W1AW was to continue
its transmissions. At the request of the ARRL, the War Emergency Radio
Service (WERS) was created in June 1942. The GPO was inundated so the
rules for WERS appeared only in QST. At the League's insistence, the FCC
continued to offer amateur licensing throughout the war; this to provide
standards for WERS applicants, and more importantly, to enable amateurs
to prove their ability before enlisting in the armed services. The purpose
of WERS was to provide communications in connection with air raid protection,
and to allow operators to continue their role in providing comms during
times of natural disaster as they'd been doing as hams (WERS was not part
of the amateur service, but was manned by hams; non-amateurs were permitted
to serve in WERS in low level positions). WERS was administered by local
CD offices; WERS licenses were issued to communities, not individuals.
WERS operated on the former amateur 2 1/2 meter band (112-116 MHz) and
on higher frequencies. Again, WERS was not part of the amateur service
but hams were asked by OCD to join - and they flocked to it. Until the
end of the war, if a ham wanted to operate he could only do so as a WERS
operator. QST fully supported WERS by publishing technical articles on
building WERS gear and modifying existing 2 1/2 m ham equipment so as
to meet the rigid WERS standards. Nearly every issued of QST contained
WERS articles - two examples: Oct. 1942: WERS operating procedures; how
to train auxiliary (non-amateur) operators. Feb. 1943: OCD's plan for
selecting frequencies. A sample of WERS operations: May and July 1942
- comms support for flooding of the Mississippi and Lake Erie; 1944 comms
support after an Atlantic Coast hurricane; 1945 - Western NY snowstorm
early in the year, spring flooding, and a September Florida hurricane.
After VJ Day in 1945, hams were given authorization to begin operating
again on the 2 1/2 m band, on a shared basis with WERS. WERS was terminated
in mid-November. By the 15th of that month, the FCC released bands at
10, 5, and 2m for amateur use. The post-war era of amateur radio had commenced.
This is probably more than you wanted to know! I really love radio history
and enjoy sharing it with anyone who expresses an interest. 73, Jeff KH2PZ |
||
Continue
with Backmail 58 Return Backmail Index |
||